Clinical Update: Grip Strength: An Uncommon Impairment
Christopher R. Brigham
Search for other papers by Christopher R. Brigham in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Upper extremity impairment rarely is assessed using grip strength, according to the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), because results can be influenced by subjective factors that are difficult to control, including sex, age, comorbidities, fatigue, handedness, time of day, pain, and the individual's cooperation. The AMA Guides, Section 16.5b, Impairment Evaluation Methods, discusses the approach used for rating peripheral nerve injuries, but this section applies only to specific nerve lesions with resulting weakness of the muscles supplied or sensory changes. Strength correlates only poorly with performance of the activities of daily living, and grip strength testing using a dynamometer or other types of isometric strength testing has not been shown to reliably discriminate between submaximal and maximal efforts. Grip strength usually is not used in the presence of decreased motion, painful conditions, deformities, or absence of body parts (eg, missing digit), nor is it used to rate weakness from a peripheral nerve lesion. In rare cases, the AMA Guides allows the use of loss of strength (eg, due to a severe muscle tear that healed leaving a palpable muscle defect). Impairment ratings based on objective anatomic findings take precedence, and loss of strength is rarely combined and only if based on unrelated etiologic or pathomechanical causes.

  • 1.

    Bleecker M, Amr S. Strength testing: grip and pinch. Guides Newsletter. 1999 (May-June).

  • 2.

    Hughes S, Gibbs J, Dunlop D, Edelman P, Singer R, Chang RW. Predictors of decline in manual performance in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:905910.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Richards LG. Posture effects on grip strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:11541156.

  • 4.

    Conti GE. Clinical interpretation of “grip strengths and required forces in accessing everyday containers in a normal population.” Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:627628.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Rice MS, Leonard C, Carter M. Grip strength and required forces in accessing everyday containers in a normal population. Am J Occup Ther. 1997;52:621628.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Pransky G, Feuerstein M, Himmelstein J, Katz JN, Vickers-Lahti M. Measuring functional outcomes in work related upper extremity disorders. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39:11951202.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Rondinelli RD, Dunn W, Hassanein KM, Keesling CA, Meredith SC, Schulz TL, Lawrence NJ. A simulation of hand impairments: effects on upper extremity function and implications toward medical impairment rating and disability determination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:13581363.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Fishbain DA. Chronic pain disability exaggeration/malingering and submaximal effort research. Clin J Pain. 1999;15(4):244274.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 69 69 69
Full Text Views 24 24 24
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
Save