Letter to the Editor: The Continuing Challenge of Evaluating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Impairment
J. True Martin Tallahassee Florida

Search for other papers by J. True Martin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2000.SepOct02
Publication Date:
01 Sep 2000
Volume/Issue:
Volume 5: Issue 5
Page Range:
3–3, 10
Restricted access

Abstract

The author responds to The Continuing Challenge of Evaluating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Impairment in the March/April 2000 issue of The Guides Newsletter. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a clinical diagnosis based on the patient's history and objective findings on examination. Patients present with dull, aching discomfort of the hand, forearm, or upper arm; paresthesias and tingling of the hand; subjective weakness or numbness; and, occasionally, autonomic changes. Nerve conduction velocity studies are highly accurate in documenting median nerve entrapment at the level of the wrists, but this is an anatomic finding and does not mean that the entrapment produces any symptoms. An electrophysiologic study does not predict if or when the median nerve entrapment will become symptomatic, which is based on the patient's history. Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV) studies do not help distinguish among the many etiologies of CTS. EMG/NCV testing can provide significant, highly accurate information regarding the physiologic function of the median nerve at the level of the wrist, but physicians must know how to interpret this information in the clinical setting. [The Editor responds: Several traditional findings of CTS have little or no diagnostic value, and electrodiagnosis is the diagnostic test of choice, although reported sensitivities range from 49% to 84% with specificities of 95% to 97%.]

Copyright:
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. 2000
Cover AMA Guides® Newsletter
AMA Guides® Newsletter
ISSN:
2642-0880
Volume/Issue:
Volume 5: Issue 5
  • 1.

    Stevens, JC. The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1987:10:99–113. AAEE Minimonograph #26.

  • 2.

    American Academy of Neurology. Practice Parameters: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. St Paul, Minn: American Academy of Neurology Practice; 1992:131–136. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee (summary statement).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Kimura J. Median Nerve. In: Brown WF, Bolton CF, eds. Clinical Electromyography. 2nd ed. Woburn, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993:235.

  • 4.

    Low PA, Smith BE, Stevens, JC, Suarez, GA, Windebank, AJ. Diseases of peripheral nerves. In: Baker AB, Baker LH, eds. Clinical Neurology. Vol. 4. New York, NY: Lippincott-Raven; 1995:46.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Label, LS. Carpal tunnel syndrome resulting from steering wheel impact. Unpublished article. Los Angeles, Calif: University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine; 1996.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Haas DC, Nord SC, Bome, MP. Carpal tunnel syndrome following automobile collisions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981;62:204–206.

  • 7.

    Abrams, BM. Entrapment and compressive neuropathies: Upper extremity. Progress in Neurology. 2000; 2:9.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 367 367 68
Full Text Views 29 29 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
Save