Search for other papers by Leon H Ensalada in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christopher R. Brigham in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, (AMA Guides), Fourth Edition, notes that individuals may consciously exaggerate the symptoms of a disorder in the clinical or impairment evaluation setting, an activity that is associated with the process of somatization. This article reviews the phenomena of somatization, its magnitude, factors that contribute, and somatizing disorders themselves. Somatization is characterized by the propensity to experience and report somatic symptoms that have no pathophysiologic explanation, to misattribute them to disease, and to seek medical attention for them. Reported symptoms could result from organic disease—which is precisely the point because somatizing patients choose symptoms, consciously or not, that will be taken as evidence of real, physical disease. The prevalence of somatization reportedly ranges from 5% to 60% and varies with the medical specialty and the clinical setting. Studies have reported that in 25% to 50% of all primary care encounters, physicians found no significant objective cause to explain the presenting symptoms. The somatization process contributes to somatoform disorders, which are mental disorders and are not intentionally produced or feigned. A table compares three types of somatizing disorders: somatoform disorders, factitious disorders, and malingering. The presence of somatization distorts symptom presentation and can confound assessment methodologies, but the AMA Guides instructs that impairment is rated on the basis of objective findings, not solely on subjective complaints.
-
1
Lipowski ZJ. Somatization: the concept and its clinical application. Am J Psychiatry 1988;145:1358–1368.
-
2
Lipowski ZJ. Somatization and depression. Psychosomatics. 1990;31:13–21.
-
3
Pilowsky I. The concept of abnormal illness behavior. Psychosomatics. 1990; 31:207–213.
-
4
Ford CV. The Somatizing Disorders: Illness as a Way of Life. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1983.
-
5
Pilowsky I, Smith QP, Katsikitis M. Illness behavior and general practice utilization: a prospective study. J Psychomatic Res. 1987;31:177–183.
-
6
Bridges KW, Goldberg DP. Somatic presentation of DSM-III psychiatric disorders in primary care. J Psychosomatic Res. 1985;29:563–569.
-
7
Katon W, Ries RK, Kleinman A. The prevalence of somatization in primary care. Compr Psychiatry. 1984;25:208–215.
-
8
Coen SJ, Sarno JE. Psychosomatic avoidance of conflict in back pain. J Am Acad Psychoanalyt. 1989;17:359–376.
-
9
Escobar JI, Golding JM, Hough RL, Karno M, Burnham MA, Wells KB. Somatization in the community: relationship to disability and use of services. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:837–840.
-
10
Smith GR, Monson RA, Ray DC. Psychiatric consultation in somatization disorder: a randomized controlled study. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1407–1413.
-
11
Brodsky CM. Sociocultural and interactional influences on somatization. Psychosomatics. 1984;24:673–680.
-
12
Ford CV. The somatizing disorders. Psychosomatics. 1986;27:327–337.
-
13
Mechanic D. The concept of illness behavior. J Chronic Disability. 1961;15:189–194.
-
14
Barsky AJ, Borus JF. Somatization and medicalization in the era of managed care. JAMA. 1995;274:1931–1934.
-
15.
American Psychiatric Association, Committee on Nomenclature and Statisics. Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
-
16
American Psychiatric Association, Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
-
17
Ford CV. The Somatizing Disorders: Illness as a Way of Life. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1983.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 289 | 289 | 57 |
| Full Text Views | 36 | 36 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
