The author of the two-part article about evaluating reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) responds to criticisms that a percentage impairment score may not adequately reflect the disability of an individual with RSD. The author highlights the importance of recognizing the difference between impairment and disability in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides): impairment is the loss, loss of use, or derangement of any body part, system, or function; disability is a decrease in or the loss or absence of the capacity to meet personal, social, or occupational demands or to meet statutory or regulatory requirements because of an impairment. The disparity between impairment and disability can be encountered in diverse clinical scenarios. For example, a person's ability to resume occupational activities following a major cardiac event depends on medical, social, and psychological factors, but nonmedical factors appear to present the greatest impediment and many persons do not resume work despite significant improvements in functional capacity. A key requirement according to the AMA Guides is objective documentation, and the author agrees that when physicians consider the disability evaluation of people, more issues than those relating to the percentage loss of function should be considered. More study of the relationships among impairment, disability, and quality of life in patients with RSD are required.
Knobler RL. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. In: Johnson RT and Griffin JW (eds). Current Therapy in Neurologic Disease. 5th ed. New York, NY: Mosby; 1996.
Schweitzer ME, Mandel S, Schwartzman RJ, et al.. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy revisited: MR imaging findings before and after infusion of contrast material. Radiology. April 1995;195(1)211-214.
Mandel S, Rothrock RW. Sympathetic dystrophies. Recognizing and managing a puzzling group of syndromes. Postgrad Med. June 1990;87:(8)213-214, 217-218.
Schwartzman RJ, Kerrigan J. The movement disorder of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Neurol. 1990;(40)57-61.
Chancellor M, Shenot P, Mandel S, et al.. Urological symptomatology in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy. U Urol. 1994;(155):1-4.
Franklin BA. Getting patients back to work after myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Phys Sports Med. 1986; 14:183.
Davidson DM. Return to work after cardiac events; A review. J Cardiac Rehabil. 1983;3:60.
Ensalada LH. Illness behavior. The Guides Newsletter. May/June 1998;4-5.
Geertzen JHB, Dukstra PU, et al.Reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the upper extremity—a 5.5 year follow up: Part 1: Impairments and perceived disability. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69:12.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1114 | 1114 | 74 |
Full Text Views | 53 | 53 | 1 |
PDF Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |