Observed Errors in Lower Extremity Impairment Rating: Recognition and Prevention
Christopher R. Brigham
Search for other papers by Christopher R. Brigham in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Charles N. Brooks
Search for other papers by Charles N. Brooks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
James B. Talmage
Search for other papers by James B. Talmage in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2022.MarApr02
Publication Date:
01 Mar 2022
Keywords:
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome; Diagnosis-Based; Gait; Joint Replacement; Lower Extremity; Peripheral Nerve; Range of Motion
Volume/Issue:
Volume 27: Issue 2
Page Range:
8–11
Restricted access

Abstract

Impairment evaluations not performed following processes defined in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) usually result in erroneous ratings. Common lower extremity impairment rating (IR) errors include using the diagnosis-based approach for more than one diagnosis within a region, and incorrectly assessing gait abnormalities, motion loss, nerve injuries, and complex regional pain syndrome. Rigorous adherence to the AMA Guides methodology and recognition of common IR errors can prevent the promulgation of erroneous impairment ratings.

Copyright:
© 2022 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. 2022
Cover AMA Guides® Newsletter
AMA Guides® Newsletter
ISSN:
2642-0880
Volume/Issue:
Volume 27: Issue 2
  • 1.

    Janssen SJ, Teunis T, Ring D, et al. Cognitive biases in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(14):624–633. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00620.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1944 1944 283
Full Text Views 42 42 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
Save