Search for other papers by Rawson L. Wood in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mathew J. Greenston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charles E. Bain in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charles N. Brooks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Complaints of spinal pain are common after motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), and evaluators may be asked whether the collision caused permanent injury to the spine, including aggravating intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) and/or causing a disc herniation. To determine causality, evaluators can use the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) to understand if a low-speed collision caused IDD. Injury causation analysis (ICA) is the scientific method used to analyze the mechanism and magnitude of injury for people who experience an MVC. ICA involves comparing the mechanical forces involved in the incident with the body's injury tolerance. Low back pain (LBP) is a common complaint following MVCs, but the literature regarding automobile collision testing has been compared to the body of evidence regarding real-world collision data and shows that, for low-speed impacts, any injuries are minor and self-limiting. Further, disability due to LBP was predicted by an abnormal baseline psychological test profile or a previously disputed compensation claim. The motions, forces, and accelerations generated in low-speed collisions are less than those encountered in activities of everyday living. ICA suggests that disc degeneration and disc herniations are pre-existing and are not caused by low-speed MVCs. Although the pain caused by a muscle sprain associated with a low-speed collision may prompt imaging studies that show disc pathology, these are coincidental and are not causally related.
-
1.
Barth RJ. Determining injury-relatedness, work-relatedness, and claim-relatedness. Guides Newsletter. May–June 2012.
-
2.
Mackay M. The increasing importance of the biomechanics of impact trauma. Sadhana. 2007; 32(4):397–408.
-
3.
DeHaven H. Mechanical Analysis of Survival in Falls from Heights of Fifty to One Hundred and Fifty Feet. New York: Cornell Medical College; 1942.
-
4.
King A. The Biomechanics of Impact Injury. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-49792-1. Accessed Aug. 3, 2017.
-
5.
Nahum A. Accidental Injury, Biomechanics and Prevention, 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
-
6.
McMeekin R. Aircraft accident investigation. In: Fundamentals of Aerospace Medicine, DeHart R, ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1985; 762–814.
-
7.
Yoganandan N, Nahum AM, Melvin JW, eds. Accidental Injury. New York: Springer; 2015. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-1732-7. Accessed Nov. 29, 2017.
-
8.
Goldston SE, ed. Concepts of primary prevention: a framework for program development. Sacramento, CA: Department of Mental Health; 1987.
-
9.
Cormier J, Gwin L, Reinhart L, et al.A comprehensive review of low-speed rear impact volunteer studies and a comparison to real-world outcomes. Spine. 2018; 43(18):1250–1258. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002622.
-
10.
Brooks CN, Brigham CR. Biomechanics in rearend Motor Vehicle Collisions. The Guides Newsletter, May/June 2007, 3-7.
-
11.
Fricke L. Traffic Crash Reconstruction. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Center for Public Safety; 2010.
-
12.
Randles B, Jones B, Welcher J, et al.The accuracy of photogrammetry vs. hands-on measurement techniques used in accident reconstruction. SAE Technical Paper; 2010. http://papers.sae.org/2010-01-0065/. Accessed July 27, 2017.
-
13.
Rucoba R, Duran A, Carr L, Erdeljac D. A three-dimensional crush measurement methodology using two-dimensional photographs. SAE Technical Paper; 2008-01-0163, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0163.
-
14.
Bailey MN, Wong BC, Lawrence JM. Data and methods for estimating the severity of minor impacts. SAE Technical Paper; 1995. http://papers.sae.org/950352/ Accessed March 7, 2017.
-
15.
Scott W, Wood R, Reinhart L, et al.The effect of head-to-head restraint distance on occupant kinematics during low-speed rear-end crashes. SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0537, 2018, doi: 10.4271/2018-01-0537.
-
16.
Blouin J-S, Inglis JT, Siegmund GP. Auditory startle alters the response of human subjects exposed to a single whiplash-like perturbation. Spine. 2006; 31(2):146–154.
-
17.
Welcher JB, Szabo TJ, Voss DP. Human occupant motion in rear-end impacts: effects of incremental increases in velocity change. SAE Technical Paper; 2001. http://papers.sae.org/2001-01-0899/. Accessed Dec. 2, 2016.
-
18.
Fugger TF, Randles BC, Wobrock JL, et al.Human occupant kinematics in low speed side impacts. SAE Technical Paper; 2002. http://papers.sae.org/2002-01-0020/. Accessed March 7, 2017.
-
19.
Szabo TJ, Welcher JB. Human subject kinematics and electromyographic activity during low speed rear impacts. http://papers.sae.org/962432/. Conference Paper in SAE Technical Papers November 1996 DOI: 10.4271/962432
-
20.
Rohlmann A, Pohl D, Bender A, et al.Activities of everyday life with high spinal loads. PloS One. 2014; 9(5):e98510.
-
21.
Gates D, Bridges A, Welch TD, et al.Lumbar loads in low to moderate speed rear impacts. SAE Technical Paper; 2010. http://papers.sae.org/2010-01-0141/. Accessed Dec. 19, 2016.
-
22.
Richards D, Carhart M, Raasch C, et al.Incidence of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries for restrained occupants in frontal collisions. In: Annual Proceedings Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 2006. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Darrin_Richards2/publication/6821661_Incidence_of_thoracic_and_lumbar_spine_injuries_for_restrained_occupants_in_frontal_collisions/links/54b800fe0cf2c27adc48425f.pdf. Accessed Dec. 19, 2016.
-
23.
van den Kroonenberg A, Philippens M, Cappon H, Wismans J. Human head-neck response during low-speed rear end impacts. SAE Technical Paper; 1998. https://doi.org/10.4271/983158
-
24.
Eiband A.. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 1959.
-
25.
Gushue DL, Probst BW, Benda B, et al.Effects of Velocity and Occupant Sitting Position on the kinematics and kinetics of the lumbar spine during simulated low-speed rear impacts. American Society of Safety Engineers Professional Development Conference and Exposition; 2006. https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ASSE-06-530. Accessed May 31, 2017.
-
26.
Vasavada AN, Brault JR, Siegmund GP. Musculotendon and fascicle strains in anterior and posterior neck muscles during whiplash injury. Spine. 2007; 32(7):756–765.
-
27.
Castro W, Meyer S, Becke M, et al.No stress—no whiplash. Intl J Legal Med. 2001; 114:316–322.
-
28.
Peterson W. On the extent and nature of nucleus-annulus integration. Spine. 2012; 37(21):1826–33.
-
29.
Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Constock BW, et al.Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 36(4):811–816.
-
30.
Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Suda K, et al.Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of the cervical spine in 1211 asymptomatic subjects. Spine. 2015; 40: 392–398.
-
31.
Urrutia J, Zamora T, Prada C. The prevalence of degenerative or incidental findings in the lumbar spine of pediatric patients: a study using magnetic resonance imaging as a screening tool. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(2):596–601.
-
32.
Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde C, Sorensen JS, Bendix T. An epidemiologic study of MRI and low back pain in 13-year-old children. Spine. 2005; 30(7):798–806.
-
33.
Boden S, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Jt Surg. 1990; 72(8):1178–1184.
-
34.
Chou R. Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154(3):181–189.
-
35.
Johanning E. Evaluation and management of occupational low back disorders. Am J Ind Med. 2000; 37(1):94–111.
-
36.
Pope MH, Goh KL, Magnusson ML. Spine ergonomics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2002; 4(1):49–68.
-
37.
Jensen M, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, et al.Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331(2):69–73.
-
38.
Duma S. Biomechanical response of the human cervical spine. Rocky Mountain Bioengineering Symposium; 2008.
-
39.
King A. Injury to the thoracolumbar spine and pelvis. In: Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002; 454–490.
-
40.
Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, et al.Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0. Spine J. 2014; 14(11):2525–2545.
-
41.
Suri P, Hunter DJ, Jouve C, et al.Inciting events associated with lumbar disc herniation. Spine J. 2010; 10(5):388–395.
-
42.
Eskay-Auerbach M, Talmage JB. Spine. In: Melhorn JM, Talmage JB, Ackerman W, Hyman MH, eds. AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Disease and Injury Causation, 2nd ed. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2014; 185–241.
-
43.
Carragee E, Alamin T, Cheng I, et al.Does minor trauma cause serious low back illness? Spine. 2006; 31(25):2942–2949.
-
44.
MacGregor AJ, Andrew T, Sambrook PN, Spector TD. Structural, psychological, and genetic influences on low back and neck pain: a study of adult female twins: genetic contribution to low back and neck pain. Arthritis Care Res. 2004; 51(2):160–167.
-
45.
Battié M, Videman T, Levalahti E, Gill K, Kaprio J. Genetic and environmental effects on disc degeneration by phenotype and spinal level—a multivariate twin study. Spine. 2008; 33(25):2801–2808.
-
46.
Aulck L, Johnson PW, Ching RP. Ex vivo biomechanics of bus driver whole body vibration exposures in the lumbar spine. IRC-13-18 IRCOBI Conference 2013; 103-110.
-
47.
Boshuizen HC, Bongers PM, Hulshof CTJ. Back disorders and occupational exposure to whole-body vibration. Int J Ind Ergon. 1990; 6:55–59.
-
48.
Boshuizen HC, Hulshof CTJ, Bongers PM. Long-term sick leave and disability pensioning due to back disorders of tractor drivers exposed to whole-body vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1990; 62:117–122.
-
49.
Jensen A, Kaerlev L, Tüchsen F, et al.Locomotor diseases among male long-haul truck drivers and other professional drivers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008; 81(7):821–827.
-
50.
Luoma K, Riihimäki H, Raininko R, et al.Lumbar disc degeneration in relation to occupation. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998; 24(5):358–366.
-
51.
Melville P. Research in car crashing. Can Med Assoc J. 1963; 89:275.
-
52.
Berry H. Chronic whiplash syndrome as a functional disorder. Arch Neurol. 2000; 57(4):592–594.
-
53.
Lam T, Ivarsson BJ. Vehicle rear impacts and spinal disc herniations in occupants: is there a basis for causation? SAE Technical Paper; 2017. http://papers.sae.org/2017-01-1458/. Accessed Dec. 15, 2017.
-
54.
Lee W, Gonzalez-Blum S, Doulgeris J. Lumbar intervertebral disc injuries in low velocity rear end collisions. Annals of Ortho and Rheum. 2014; 2(4): 1036-1046.
-
55.
Lam T, Ivarsson BJ. Spinal disc herniations in occupants involved in frontal impacts. SAE Technical Paper; 2018. http://www.sae.org/content/2018-01-0545/. Accessed April 17, 2018.
-
56.
Talmage JB, Blaisdell J, Eskay-Auerbach M, Brigham CR. Impairment rating for non-specific back pain under the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition: medical perspective. Guides Newsletter. March–April 2014.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1784 | 1784 | 313 |
| Full Text Views | 29 | 29 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
