Search for other papers by Robert Aurbach in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
When injured persons feel pain and a physician tells them that they have a permanent condition, the feeling of pain can become associated over time with the diagnosis, the emotional response to the diagnosis, and factors associated with the diagnosis (including helplessness, fear, anger and overwhelming stress). Even the language associated with the process can be misleading: To some, the phrase “maximum medical improvement” may have the ominous ring of a life sentence with a judgment that they have reached the highest potential for recovery, even if this is not the case. The US legal system often contributes to needless disabling, to the extent that the author coins the term “attorneyogenic disability.” Delaying dispute resolution following disputes in the case causes harm by creating a period when injured workers may obsess about their condition, the people who have wronged them, and the unfairness of the system in failing to compensate them. As delays stretch on, the individual's perception of physical symptoms may become habitual in a complex association of thoughts, feelings, and emotions that affect the worker's neural network. Finally, the legal system stops when the claim is resolved, and the patient's advocate has no systemic motivation to assist after the claim is completed. Planning for functional adaptation and treatment after the dispute resolution often is lacking, especially after the individual has been exposed both to catastrophic thinking in the courtroom and multiple medical evaluations and treatment protocols.
- Abstract
- Acquired Disability Behavior and Neuroplasticity
- Attorneys and Legal System
- Dispute Resolution in Workers' Compensation
- The Role of Attorneys in Workers' Compensation Cases
- The Role of Attorneys in the Creation of Disability
- The Role of Attorney Fees in Creating Disability
- Other Factors Creating “Attorneyogenic” Disability
- Encouragement of Behaviors for the Purpose of Enhancement of the Case
- Change of Locus of Control
- Abandonment
- Catastrophic Thinking
- Professional Enabling
- Charges of Symptom Magnification and Malingering
- Multiple Medical Evaluations and Treatment Protocols
- Solutions
- Conclusion
- References
-
1.
Strang JP. The chronic disability syndrome. In: Aronoff GM, ed. Evaluation and Treatment of Chronic Pain. Baltimore, MD: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1985: 603-23.
-
2.
Duffau H. Brain plasticity: From pathophysiological mechanisms to therapeutic applications. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2006; 13(9):885-897.
-
3.
Kolb B, Whishaw I. Brain Plasticity and Behavior, Annual Review of Psychology, 1998;48:43-64, 1998.
-
4.
Doidge, N., The Brain that Changes Itself. 2007, Penguin Books, New York, NY.
-
5.
Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, et al. Chronicity, recurrence, and return to work in low back pain: common prognostic factors. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2004; 47: 179-189.
-
6.
Jellema P, Van der Horst HE, Vlaeyen JW, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with (sub) acute low back pain differ across treatment groups. Spine. 2006; 31: 1699-1705.
-
7.
Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ, eds. Pain Management: Practical Applications of the Biopsychosocial Perspective in Clinical and Occupational Settings. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.
-
8.
Van der Windt D, Hay E, Jellema P. Psychosocial interventions for low back pain in primary care: Lessons learned from recent trials. Spine. 2008; 33:81-89.
-
9.
Bruns D, Disorbio, JM Assessment of Biopsychosocial Risk Factors for Medical Treatment: A Collaborative Approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. DOI 10.1007/s10990-009-91-48-9.
-
10.
McGill CM. Industrial back problems: a control program. J Occ Med. 1968:10:174-178.
-
11.
Johoda M. Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983.
-
12.
Nachemson A. Work for all–for those with LBP as well. Clin Orth Related Research. 1983:179:77-85.
-
13.
Sander R, Meyers J. The relationship of disability to compensation status in railroad workers. Spine. 1986;11:141-143.
-
14.
Stewart JM. The impact of health status on the duration of unemployment spells and the implications for studies of the impact of unemployment on health status. J Health Econ. 2001:20;781-796.
-
15.
Gatchel R and Kisimo N, Clinical Effectiveness of Early Intervention for Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders, IAIABC Journal, 2010; 7(1).
-
16.
Hoogendoorn, W. E., van Poppel, M. N. M., Bongers, P. M., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (2000). Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and in the personal situation as risk factors for back pain. Spine, 25, 2114-2125,
-
17.
Turner J, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Sotver B, Wu R, Gluck JV, Kickizer TM. Early Predictors of Chronic Work Disability, A Prospective, Population-Based Study of Workers With Back Injuries. Spine. 2008; 33(25):2809-2818.
-
18.
Quarles L., Alternative Dispute Resolution on a Shoestring. IAIABC Journal. 2006; 43(2).
-
19.
Workers' Compensation Laws, 2d edition–a Joint Publication of IAIABC and WCRI, June 2009.
-
20.
Model Rules of Professional Conduct, American Bar Association, 2004.
-
21.
Huber B, Papa A. Insurance Coverage Litigation: Should We Look to the Statute of Glocester and Common Law Reception Statutes for a Solution? Coverage. 2006; 16(1).
-
22.
Copeland M., CBT for Pain Management. IAIABC Journal. 2009; 46(2).
-
23.
Gatchel R, Kishino N, Minotti D. The Clinical Effectiveness of Early Intervention for Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders. IAIABC Journal. 2010; 47(1).
-
24.
Turk D, Okifuji A. Psychological Factors in Chronic Pain: Evolution and Revolution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2002; 70(3): 678-690.
-
25.
Steelman D, Goerdt J, McMillan J. Caseflow Management: The Heart of Court Management in the New Millennium, National Center for State Courts; 2000.
-
26.
Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3 a 1 and 3 and b. American Bar Association, 2004.
-
27.
Lefcourt H. Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research, 2d Ed., 1982, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates, Publishers, Hillsdale, New Jersey
-
28.
Gatchel R. Comorbidity of Chronic Pain and Mental Health Disorders: The Biospychosocial Perspective, American Psychologist, November, 2004, Turk D and Gatchel R. (Eds) Psychological Approaches to Pain Management: A Practitioner's Handbook (2d Ed) 2002, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
-
29.
Peterson, C., Maier, S., and Seligman, M., Learned Helplessness: A Theory for the Age of Personal Control, 1993, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
-
30.
Barsky, A.J. and Borus, J.F. Somatization and medicalization in the era of managed care. JAMA. 1996;274:1931-1934.
-
31.
Horwitz AV, Wakefield JC. The Loss of Sadness: How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow into Depressive Disorder, New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007.
-
32.
Barsky AJ, Deans EC. Stop Being Your Symptoms and Start Being Yourself. New York: HaperCollins. 2006.
-
33.
Wegscheider-Cruse S. Another Chance: Hope and Health for the Alcoholic Family”, Second Edition, Science and Behavior Books, Inc. 1989.
-
34.
Reville R. et al, An Evaluation of New Mexico Workers' Compensation Permanent Partial Disability and Return to Work, RAND Corp., 2001.
-
35.
Biddle J, Boden L, Reville R. Permanent Partial Disability from Occupational Injuries: Earnings Losses and Replacement in Three States, RAND Corp., 2001.
-
36.
Reville R., The Impact of a Disabling Workplace Injury on Earnings and Labor Force Participation, RAND Corp., 2001.
-
37.
Peterson, M, et al, Compensation Permanent Workplace Injuries: A Study of the California System, RAND Corp., 1998.
-
38.
Tauber R, Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: A Practical Guide A Practical Guide to its Use in Education, 1997, Praeger Publishers, Westport CT
-
40.
Rogers R. Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008.
-
41.
Aronoff G, Evaluating Malingering in Contested Injury or Illness, Pain Practice. 2007; 7(2):178-204.
-
42.
Mittenberg W, Patton C, Canyock E, Condit D. Base Rates of Malingering and Symptom Exaggeration, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2002; 24(8):1094-1102.
-
43.
Conroy MA, Kwartner PP. Malingering, Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2006; 2(3): 29-51.
-
44.
Reid, WH, Malingering, Journal of Psychiatric Practice. 2000; 226-228.
-
45.
Weintraub MI. (eds) Malingering and Conversion Reactions. Neurologic Clinics. 13(2). May 1995.
-
46.
Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ (Eeds) Handbook of Complex Occupational Disability Claims, 2005, Springer Publishing, New York, NY.
-
47.
Brigham CR, Uejo C, Dilbeck L, Uehlein WF. Impairment Ratings: Observations Based On Review of More Than 6,000 Cases. Guides Newsletter. March - April 2011.
-
48.
Conrad P. The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press; 2007.
-
49.
Tauber, supra.
-
50.
Conrad, supra.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 963 | 938 | 70 |
| Full Text Views | 24 | 24 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
