Case Example: Rating Lower Extremity Injuries Involving Multiple Diagnoses in One Region Using the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition
Craig Uejo
Search for other papers by Craig Uejo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Charles N. Brooks
Search for other papers by Charles N. Brooks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Injuries to a specific region can result in more than one diagnosis. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, states that, in most cases, only one diagnosis in a region (eg, hip, knee, or foot/ankle) is appropriate. If a patient has two significant diagnoses (eg, ankle instability and posterior tibial tendonitis), the examiner should use the diagnosis with the highest impairment rating in that region that is causally related. The rationale for this principle is that the rating for the diagnosis with the highest impairment also encompasses the functional loss of diagnoses with lesser impairment; it also attempts to prevent the use of multiple diagnoses to inflate the impairment rating. In the Case Example, a 62-year-old female teacher was tripped and fell on her left knee at work; the diagnoses were osteoarthritis and medial collateral ligament sprain. Despite activity modification and extensive treatment, she reported only moderate improvement; an orthopedic surgeon was consulted and recommended total knee replacement (TKR), but the patient declined and decided to retire with the option to consider TKR later, if necessary. Causation is an issue because tricompartmental arthritis clearly was not caused by the fall, but one wonders about the role of the individual's arthritis is unclear. Evaluators should be aware that such apportionment varies by jurisdiction.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 67 67 36
Full Text Views 31 31 1
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
Save