Chapter 2 Practical Application of the AMA Guides

Restricted access
Chapter 2: Practical Application of the Guides
Table 2-1: Fundamental Principles of the Guides

Summary of Updates to AMA Guides Sixth Edition 2022

  • Language describing the new evidence-based editorial process explains why the latest edition of the AMA Guides is rooted in science and best evidence.
  • Encourages documenting evidence and the standard used to determine the impairment rating in reports.
  • No changes to impairment ratings or methodology.

Chapter 2: Practical Application of the AMA Guides

  • Introduction
    • Description of changes: revised to reflect the evidence-based editorial process and AMA H-365.976
    • Deletion: The Guides is written by medical doctors for medical doctors and others permitted to do impairment evaluations. 
    • Insertion: The AMA Guides is written by physicians for conducting impairment evaluations. Physician is defined as an individual who has received a Doctor of Medicine or a Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine degree or a recognized equivalent physician degree and who would be eligible for an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) residency.
  • Table 2-1 Fundamental Principles of the AMA Guides (#6)
    • Deletion: “Impairment evaluation requires medical knowledge. Physicians duly recognized by an appropriate jurisdiction should perform such assessments within their applicable scope of practice and field of expertise.”
    • Insertion: “Impairment evaluation requires medical knowledge. Physicians, chiropractors, and others permitted to do impairment evaluations recognized by the relevant jurisdiction perform impairment evaluations within their applicable scope of practice and field of expertise and calculate impairment ratings utilizing the AMA Guides.”
  • Section 2.3a Who Performs Impairment Ratings?
    • Deletion: Impairment evaluation requires medical knowledge; therefore, mostly doctors who are qualified in allo pathic or osteopathic medicine or chiropractic medicine use the Guides to evaluate permanent impairment. For the purpose of determining impairment, the appropriate health regulatory agency in a given jurisdiction is the best-suited authority to determine the definition of doctor in regard to who uses the Guides to rate impairment in that jurisdiction.

      It must be emphasized, however, that even though the Guides is mainly written by medical doctors for medical doctors and others permitted to do impairment evaluations, nonphysician evaluators may analyze an impairment evaluation to determine if it was performed in accordance with the Guides.

    • Insertion: Impairment evaluation requires medical knowledge. Physicians, chiropractors, and others recognized by the relevant jurisdiction perform impairment evaluations within their applicable scope of practice and field of expertise and calculate impairment ratings utilizing the AMA Guides. For the purpose of determining impairment, the appropriate health regulatory agency in a given jurisdiction is the best-suited authority to determine who may submit an impairment rating in that jurisdiction.

      It must be emphasized, however, that even though the AMA Guides is mainly written by physicians for conducting impairment evaluations, non-physician evaluators may analyze an impairment evaluation to determine if it was performed in accordance with the AMA Guides.

  • Section 2.6 Impairment Evaluation and the Law
    • Description of changes: inserted language elaborates on the concept that content updates in AMA Guides Sixth 2022 and future editions of the AMA Guides are supported by an evidence-based foundation, upholding the AMA’s commitment to providing information for physicians and patients based on the most current, evidence-based medicine
  • 2.7dConcluding the Report: Use of Evidence-Based Medicine
    • Description of changes: encourages users to acknowledge the standard (eg, edition of the AMA Guides) used to perform the evaluation and impairment rating and the science/evidence used to support recommendations I the report. Specimen language is also offered for consideration for raters to insert into their reports to describe this process.
  • Impairment report template: Standard(s) Used to Determine the Impairment Rating is Offered for Consideration.
  • Minor editorial updates throughout the chapter have been made to improve readability and for clarity.
  • 1.

    American Medical Association. Definition and Use of the Term Physician. H-405.951. Published June 2019. Accessed September 20, 2021. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/Physician%20definition?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-H-405.951.xml

  • 2.

    American Medical Association. Adopting the Use of the Most Recent and Updated Edition of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. H-365.976. Published June 2021. Accessed August 27, 2021. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/ama%20guides?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-H-365.976.xml

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Ranavaya MI, Andersson GB. The impairment and disability evaluations In: Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, eds. Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders: Function, Outcomes & Evidence. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Federal Employees' Compensation Act. Available at http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/owcp/fecafact.htm. Accessed June, 2007.

  • 5.

    Katz RT, Rondinelli RD. Major U.S. disability and compensation systems graphically compared. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 12: 499501, 2001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    McBride ED. Disability Evaluation and Principles of Treatment of Compensible Injuries. 6th ed. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Co, 1963.

  • 7.

    Spector R. Cultural Diversity in Health and Illness. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc; 2004.

  • 8.

    Guidotti TL, Rose SG. Science on the witness stand: evaluating scientific evidence. In: Guidotti TL, Rose SG, eds: Law, Adjudication, and Policy. Beverly Farms, Mass: OEM Health Information; 2001.Page intentionally left blank.Page intentionally left blank.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Full Text Views 88 42 7
Save