Chapter 7: The Urinary and Reproductive Systems
- Introduction
- 7.1 Principles of Assessment
- 7.2 The Urinary System
- 7.3 Upper Urinary Tract
- 7.3a Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-1 0% to 14% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-2 0% to 14% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-3 15% to 34% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-4 15% to 34% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-5 15% to 34% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-6 15% to 34% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-7 35% to 59% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-8 35% to 59% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-9 35% to 59% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-10 60% to 95% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-11 60% to 95% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- Example 7-12 60% to 95% Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- 7.3a Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Upper Urinary Tract Disease
- 7.4 Urinary Diversion
- 7.5 Bladder
- 7.5a Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Bladder Disease
- Example 7-15 0% to 15% Impairment Due to Bladder Disease
- Example 7-16 0% to 15% Impairment Due to Bladder Disease
- Example 7-17 16% to 40% Impairment Due to Bladder Disease
- Example 7-18 41% to 70% Impairment Due to Bladder Disease
- Example 7-19 41% to 70% Impairment Due to Bladder Disease
- Example 7-20 41% to 70% Impairment Due to Bladder Disease
- 7.5a Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Bladder Disease
- 7.6 Urethra
- 7.6a Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Urethral Disease
- Example 7-21 0% to 10% Impairment Due to Urethral Disease
- Example 7-22 11% to 20% Impairment Due to Urethral Disease
- Example 7-23 11% to 20% Impairment Due to Urethral Disease
- Example 7-24 21% to 40% Impairment Due to Urethral Disease
- Example 7-25 21% to 40% Impairment Due to Urethral Disease
- Example 7-26 21% to 40% Impairment Due to Urethral Disease
- 7.6a Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Urethral Disease
- 7.7 Male Reproductive Organs
- 7.7a Penis
- 7.7b Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Penile Disease
- 7.7c Scrotum
- Example 7-30 0% to 10% Impairment Due to Scrotal Disease
- Example 7-31 11% to 20% Impairment Due to Scrotal Disease
- Example 7-32 21% to 35% Impairment Due to Scrotal Disease
- 7.7d Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Scrotal Disease
- 7.7e Testicles, Epididymides, and Spermatic Cords
- 7.7f Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Testicular, Epididymal, and Spermatic Cord Disease
- 7.7g Prostate and Seminal Vesicles
- 7.7h Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Prostate and Seminal Vesicle Disease
- 7.8 Female Reproductive Organs
- 7.8a Vulva and Vagina
- 7.8b Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Vulval and Vaginal Disease
- 7.8c Cervix and Uterus
- 7.8d Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Cervical and Uterine Disease
- Example 7-42 0% to 15% Impairment Due to Cervical and Uterine Disease
- Example 7-43 0% to 15% Impairment Due to Cervical and Uterine Disease
- Example 7-44 16% to 25% Impairment Due to Cervical and Uterine Disease
- Example 7-45 26% to 35% Impairment Due to Cervical and Uterine Disease
- Example 7-46 26% to 35% Impairment Due to Cervical and Uterine Disease
- 7.8e Fallopian Tubes and Ovaries
- 7.8f Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Fallopian Tube and Ovarian Disease
- Example 7-47 0% to 15% Impairment Due to Fallopian Tube and Ovarian Disease
- Example 7-48 16% to 25% Impairment Due to Fallopian Tube and Ovarian Disease
- Example 7-49 26% to 35% Impairment Due to Fallopian Tube and Ovarian Disease
- Example 7-50 26% to 35% Impairment Due to Fallopian Tube and Ovarian Disease
- 7.9 Urinary and Reproductive Systems Impairment Evaluation Summary
- References
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
1.
Lea RD, Gerhardt JJ. Current concepts review range of motion measurement. Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77:784–798.
-
2.
Mayer T, Kondraske G, Beals S, Gatchel R. Spinal range of motion: accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement. Spine. 1997;22:1976–1984.
-
3.
Gerhardt JJ. Documentation of Joint Motion. Rev 3rd ed. Portland, Ore: Oregon Medical Association; 1992.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Text Views | 34 | 34 | 0 |
AMA Guides® Editorial
AMA Guides® Education
© 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by PubFactory